Con+Acknowledgement+of+Opposition's+Side

There are proponents for animal testing. The pros of animal testing think "human suffering is our first priority and the prevention of animal suffering or death is secondary to that, but still important"(Dixon par. 2).They believe animal testing is fine because it prevents human suffering by making medicines and drugs. Even though it is saving humans it doesn't save the animals. Millions of animals die each year in experiments. The pros think animal testing is the only way to test resources. They are wrong there because there are alternatives to many tests that are currently done on animals, such as growing tissue or cell cultures from human cells in the laboratory(par. 4) Dixon says "It is only acceptable to test human medicines on human beings if they give their consent." "Non-human animals are never able to give consent. It is therefore never acceptable to test medicines on perfectly healthy animals, even if the treatments are used for other animals."(par.6)