Acknowledgement+of+Opposition's+Side

cons: There are pros and cons for animal testing. The pros of animal testing think "human suffering is our first priority and the prevention of animal suffering or deathis secondary to that but, still important."(Dixon, par. 2)They believe animal testing is ok because it prevents human suffering by making medicines and drugs. Even though it is saving humans it doesn't save the animals. Millions of animals die each year in expeirments. The pros think animal testing is the only way to test resources. They are wrong there because, there are altarnatives to many tests that are curren tly done on animals like growing tissue or cell cultures from human cells in the laboratory(par. 4)"It is only acceptable to test humans medicines on human beings if they give their consent." "Non-human animals are never able to give consent. It is therefore never acceptable to test medicines on Perfectly healthy animals, even if the treatments are used for other animals."(par.6)

pros  Animal testing is a controversial topic. (What is Animal Testing?” par. 5) Most people don’t agree with it because it is hurting the animals. This is where they are wrong, animal testing. Animal Testing doesn’t always hurt the animals. There are ways to test the animals without hurting or killing them. Also the animal testers don’t just test the animals to hurt or kill them; they test the animals for important reasons like to make a cure for certain diseases. I understand that sometimes animals are hurt in the process but, they are hurt only to save a person in need for some kind of cure. Saving humans are the first priority and saving the animals are only second but still important. (Dixon par. 1)